The Aliens and Borders Service announced Tuesday 21st March that it had inspected nightlife establishments and massage parlors in the district of Aveiro, having identified several foreign women and detained one of them.
After receiving denunciations of illegal immigration, illegal labor and pimping, the SEF carried out a surveillance operation for two nightlife establishments in the municipalities of Águeda and Vagos, with the support of the Inspecção de Finanças (ATA).
During the course of the police action, several foreign women were identified, one of whom was detained for falsification of documents and illegal stay in Portugal and another was notified that she has 20 days to leave the national territory.
Two other women were notified to attend the SEF, to determine the contours of their stay in the country.
The two night establishments were notified by the authorities for the collection and use of illegal foreign labour, whose fines vary between four thousand and 20 thousand euros.
- New Zealand Volcano latest
- Fewer road deaths but more accidents and serious injuries compared to 2018
- Man dies after being hit by machine in Madeira
- Doctors in Spain revive British woman after six-hour cardiac arrest
- MADEIRA – FLIGHT CANCELLATIONS DUE TO HIGH WINDS
- Government says over 90% of municipalities have forest fire protection plans
- London attack shows EU-UK cooperation ‘essential
- Fires: Castelo Branco district without re-ignitions or false alarms in 2019
- PORTUGAL TO CO-CHAIR MINISTERIAL COUNCIL OF EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY
- Municipalities claim changes in Civil Protection result in better articulation
- Portugal is the best destination in the world and wins 13 tourism ‘Oscars’
- Porto – PSP confirms detention of a British national and identification of 16 Belgians after clashes that caused “several injured
- Lisbon – PSP crackdown of pickpockets – 305 detained so far this year
- European Commission forcing Portugal to change taxes on imported used cars
- Deco warns: choose from Amazon, Booking, or TripAdvisor reviews? May be false